This post is next in my series of posts on Morse theory and its various generalizations. I last talked about “Classical Morse Theory,” (CMT) which studies the how the topology of a (real) smooth manifold is related to critical points of Morse functions defined on that manifold. Say the manifold is called , and we have some Morse function,
; (CMT;A) says that the topological type of the set
remains constant unless
passes over a critical value of
. In the case where
is a critical value, we study the change in topology of
with a pair of spaces,
, which we call local Morse data for for f at p (which I’ll write as
), defined as follows: let
be “sufficiently small,”
a small ball centered at
of radius
(say, with respect to some Riemannian metric on
). Then, for
“sufficiently small,”
(thankfully, the topological type of is independent of the choice of metric, and independent of
, provided that they’re chosen to be sufficiently small).
Say is a non-degenerate critical point of
of index
(recall that this means the Hessian of
at
in non-singular, and has
negative eigenvalues),
the corresponding critical value. Since critical values are locally isolated in
, there exists some
small so that
is the only critical value of
in the interval
. Then, (CMT;B) says that
is obtained as a topological space from
by attaching the space $latex B_\epsilon(p) \cap f^{-1}[v-\delta,v+\delta]$ along the space $latex B_\epsilon(p) \cap f^{-1}(v-\delta)$. More specifically,
where , and
is the
-dimensional disk.
Now, me being me, I need to see how this fits into more general machinery. Thankfully, the way has already been paved for us: the Morse theory for constructible sheaves explored in Topology of Singular Spaces and Constructible Sheaves by J. Schurmann. There, local Morse data is framed, functorially, in terms of local cohomology groups:
(*)
where is the constant sheaf with stalk
on
, considered as a complex of sheaves concentrated in degree zero.
is the derived functor “sections with support in
, and we take the stalk at the point
. This all seems a bit complicated, and it is at first for everybody. Worth investigating though, since understanding the LMD(f,p) construction is instrumental in generalizing the ideas of CMT and SMT to the “microlocal” setting; in particular, to the derived category (of bounded, constructible complexes of sheaves), and the construction of the “microsupport”of a complex of sheaves.
Let’s investigate (*). By constructibility of , there is an
such that
which is isomorphic to
where is such that
. Then, by (CMT;A), there is a homeomorphism of pairs
, inducing the isomorphism
In short,